Reframing Humanitarian and Development Practice | Reimagining Giving

What could development and philanthropy look like if we did things differently? At PRA, we create spaces to question what we’ve inherited, unlearn what no longer serves us, and explore new ways of working — with more trust, shared power, and voice for the people and communities closest to the work.

PRA strategic plan 2025-2028

Read

Why reform

The gap between rhetoric and practice

The language of localization, equity, participation, and trust has become increasingly common. Yet the systems through which decisions are made, resources are allocated, and legitimacy is conferred have changed far more slowly

The legacies we still carry

Old assumptions continue to shape new ways of working. Colonial patterns of power remain embedded in funding models, organisational cultures, partnerships, and knowledge systems — shaping whose expertise is valued, who gets to decide, and who is expected to adapt.

A sector under pressure to change

Business as usual is becoming harder to sustain. Shrinking aid budgets, growing humanitarian needs, and rising expectations for locally led action are exposing the limits of existing models. We need more than incremental change. We need to rethink how power, resources, relationships, and accountability work.

The challenges facing philanthropy and development are deeply interconnected, but they are not insurmountable. Systems do not change simply because policies evolve or funding shifts—they change when people choose to think differently, relate differently, and work differently.

Our Response: The PRA ecosystem

We believe lasting reform begins with how we work together.

01
Collaborative Unlearning

Rethinking the assumptions behind practice. We create spaces for practitioners and organisations to examine inherited ideas about power, expertise, partnership, and progress — and experiment with different ways of working.

02
Then KIN solidarity network

KIN connects people and organisations through solidarity, reciprocity, and accompaniment — creating relationships where knowledge and expertise is mutually beneficial

03
The KIN fund

Moving resources closer to where change happens. KIN provides flexible, trust-based financing that gives locally rooted organisations greater agency to define priorities, make decisions, and steward resources in ways that respond to their realities.

04
Practice based Learning

Democratizing knowledge through practice: We value lived experience, practitioner insight, collective reflection, and evidence generated through practice.

Our Philosophy

People Transform Systems

Change begins with people: Systems are shaped by the people within them. Lasting change begins with how we think, relate, make decisions, and lead — and with the everyday practices that shape institutions from within.

Practice Brings Values to Life

What we believe must shape how we work: Equity, localisation, and justice mean little if they do not change how decisions are made, partnerships are formed, resources are shared, and accountability is practiced.

Trust Makes Local Leadership Possible

Trust is the foundation of meaningful partnership: Local leadership grows through relationships grounded in humility, reciprocity, and shared accountability

Our Reach

0

Members

Development practitioners engaging in collaborative unlearning for practice change

0

Organisations

Organisations rethinking practice and engaging in collaborative unlearning with us

0

Geographic footprint

Distribution of organisations engaged in rethinking development practice.

Work With Us

There are many ways to be part of the work. Whether you are rethinking practice within your organisation, looking for meaningful solidarity with locally rooted organisations, or interested in moving resources differently, there is a place for you in the PRA ecosystem.

Bring the Work Into Your Organisation

Bring Collaborative Unlearning into your organisation, or partner with us to rethink how power, partnerships, and resources work in practice.

Get in touch
Give in Solidarity

Move resources with trust: Support community-led initiatives through Relational Stewardship — KIN’s approach to stewarding resources through trust, solidarity, shared accountability, and local agency. We combine the discipline of outcomes-focused philanthropy with the flexibility and power-sharing needed for locally led change.

Give in Solidarity
Receive & Offer Accompaniment

Join a relational ecosystem where community-rooted organisations, funders, grantmakers, and practitioners can access accompaniment, practical support, contextual insight, and peer learning

Receive Accompaniment

Engagement Options for the Collaborative Unlearning lab

01

Intensive Unlearning Sprint (1 Week)

A focused engagement designed to surface critical challenges, build shared understanding, and catalyse immediate action.

02

Collaborative Unlearning Journey (6 Weeks)

A deeper learning experience delivered through weekly facilitated sessions that allow participants to reflect, experiment, apply insights, and build new practices over time.

03

Conversations for change

Facilitated conversations exploring specific partnership challenges such as localisation, trust, compliance, accountability, power sharing, or participatory decision-making.

Reflections and Feedback

It did not occur to me that unlearning should be a big part of my growth as well. But today reminded me that growth is not only about learning new things; sometimes, it is equally about unlearning what we have long accepted as normal, a much needed conversation, especially in the development space. One of my biggest takeaways was the importance of embracing a kinship mindset in development work. It was a priceless afternoon of unlearning and learning, with a clear reminder that transforming systems begins with transforming the way we think.

R

Ruth Munyari

Leadership & Governance Programs Strategist: Kenya

Through the Labs, I am learning that Trust is the foundation upon which good partnerships are made. When trust exists, this leads to open conversations and greater understanding of different perspectives. This allows decisions to be made collaboratively, even if, officially, the power dynamics give one partner more authority than the other. I am reading about trust-based philanthropy more and will try to focus on what that can mean for Egyptian NGOs. It would be lovely to have longer sessions in the future because there is such a rich experience that we can learn from 😀

Y

Yasmine D'Alessandro

Egypt

I am unlearning the assumptions, power dynamics, and long-standing ways of doing things that have shaped development practice. I am moving away from the comfort of top-down decision-making toward shared ownership, where local voices are not just included but genuinely valued. Through this process, I am learning that transparency and collaboration are not optional; they are essential to how I work, decide, and build with others.

M

Mamta Rao

Broken Chalk - India

One of the strongest reflections from the session was the recognition that decision-making is often shaped by power and control over resources. While many organisations describe decision-making as “bottom-up,” the reality is that decisions are frequently influenced by those who hold funding and institutional power. Many of us, consciously or unconsciously, align our decisions with the priorities of those in positions of authority.

M

Moses Wanami

CFAO Mobility- Kenya

Let’s Connect

If you are curious about our work, exploring partnership with PRA, or interested in becoming an Associate Member, we would be glad to hear from you. We welcome conversations with practitioners, organisations, and funders who are seeking alignment, shared learning, and more relational approaches to development and philanthropy.

Schedule a Conversation

Latest Articles

chatgpt-image-aug-17,-2026,-03_57_05-pm.png

August 16, 2026

The real test for decolonial philanthropy: What are we actually willing to unlearn?

Unlearning should eventually become visible in the way a funder makes decisions, in who participates in setting priorities, in how risk is understood, in how flexible funding can be, in whether local organisations can influence the agenda, in how feedback moves through a relationship and in what happens when a community says, “This is not working.”

Read More →
chatgpt-image-jul-24,-2026,-02_16_12-pm.png

August 6, 2026

CUL Cycle 2 prospectus

Every development system carries a history. The partnerships we build, the institutions we strengthen, the evidence we privilege, the risks we manage, and even the language we use are shaped by assumptions inherited over generations. Some of these assumptions have enabled progress. Others continue to reproduce unequal relationships, concentrate decision-making, and distance development from the communities it seeks to serve.

Read More →
1.png

August 6, 2026

CUL 2-Designed for professionals who steward, influence, or make decisions about how resources are mobilised, allocated, and governed

Philanthropic capital carries histories of generosity and solidarity, but also of extraction, accumulation, and unequal power. Those histories continue to shape who defines priorities, who controls resources, and whose knowledge and leadership are trusted.

Read More →