Reframing Humanitarian and Development Practice | Reimagining Giving
We create spaces for collaborative unlearning that disrupt and reframe colonial legacies, extractive practices, and inherited assumptions about power, partnership, and progress, to reimagine development and philanthropy in service of justice, dignity, and shared human flourishing.
New to PRA? Start Here.
PRA at a glanceWhy reform
The gap between rhetoric and practice
The language of localization, equity, participation, and trust has become increasingly common. Yet the systems through which decisions are made, resources are allocated, and legitimacy is conferred have changed far more slowly
The Enduring Influence of Colonial Legacies
While institutions have evolved, many inherited assumptions remain embedded in organisational cultures, funding models, and partnership practices. Paternalistic approaches to decision-making, extractive knowledge production, transactional partnerships, legitimacy hierarchies, and tokenistic participation continue to influence how resources, expertise, and authority are distributed.
A Sector That Can No Longer Afford Business as Usual
The humanitarian and development sector is under unprecedented pressure. Declining aid budgets, growing humanitarian needs, and increasing expectations for locally led action demand more than incremental reform—they require fundamentally different ways of working. Models built around complex funding chains, high administrative costs, and externally driven decision-making are becoming increasingly unsustainable.
The challenges facing philanthropy and development are deeply interconnected, but they are not insurmountable. Systems do not change simply because policies evolve or funding shifts—they change when people choose to think differently, relate differently, and work differently.
Our Response: The PRA ecosystem
At PRA, we respond to today's development challenges by transforming the human systems that shape them. We create spaces for collaborative unlearning, solidarity, and practice-based inquiry that enable practitioners and organisations examine inherited assumptions, redistribute power, strengthen locally led leadership, and move beyond reform rhetoric towards more just and relational Humanitarian and development practice.
Collaborative Unlearning
Decolonizes practice by transforming inherited mindsets, institutional cultures, and everyday behaviors
Then KIN solidarity network
Rebuilds development relationships through solidarity, reciprocity, and accompaniment rather than consultancy and dependency.
The KIN fund
Advances trust-based, locally led financing that shifts resources closer to communities and supports their priorities.
Practice based Learning
Democratizes knowledge by valuing lived experience, collective reflection, and practitioner-generated evidence.
Our Philosophy
People Transform Systems
Systems are made up of people; Lasting systems change begins by transforming how people think, relate, and lead. Meaningful reform starts with the everyday beliefs, behaviors, and decisions that shape institutions from within.
Practice Brings Values to Life
Practice matters as much as policy; Commitments to equity, localization, and justice only become meaningful when they are reflected in how decisions are made, partnerships are formed, and power is shared in everyday practice.
Trust Makes Local Leadership Possible
Trust is built through relationships, and communities are leaders, not beneficiaries. Sustainable development is rooted in relationships of humility, reciprocity, and shared accountability that recognise communities as equal partners and leaders of their own development.

Our Reach
Members
Development practitioners engaging in collaborative unlearning for practice change
Organisations
Organisations rethinking practice and engaging in collaborative unlearning with us
Geographic footprint
Distribution of organisations engaged in rethinking development practice.
Work with us
Would you like to introduce Unlearning into your organisation? We would be glad to enable it.
Get in touchSupport community-led initiatives through a relational model of giving that prioritises trust, dignity, and shared flourishing over transactional funding.
Give in SolidarityJoin a relational support ecosystem where CBOs access tailored accompaniment, practical support, and peer learning grounded in respect and shared purpose.
Receive AccompanimentEngagement Options for the Collaborative Unlearning lab
Intensive Unlearning Sprint (1 Week)
A focused engagement designed to surface critical challenges, build shared understanding, and catalyse immediate action.
Collaborative Unlearning Journey (6 Weeks)
A deeper learning experience delivered through weekly facilitated sessions that allow participants to reflect, experiment, apply insights, and build new practices over time.
Conversations for change
Facilitated conversations exploring specific partnership challenges such as localisation, trust, compliance, accountability, power sharing, or participatory decision-making.
Reflections and Feedback
It did not occur to me that unlearning should be a big part of my growth as well. But today reminded me that growth is not only about learning new things; sometimes, it is equally about unlearning what we have long accepted as normal, a much needed conversation, especially in the development space. One of my biggest takeaways was the importance of embracing a kinship mindset in development work. It was a priceless afternoon of unlearning and learning, with a clear reminder that transforming systems begins with transforming the way we think.
Ruth Munyari
Leadership & Governance Programs Strategist: Kenya
Through the Labs, I am learning that Trust is the foundation upon which good partnerships are made. When trust exists, this leads to open conversations and greater understanding of different perspectives. This allows decisions to be made collaboratively, even if, officially, the power dynamics give one partner more authority than the other. I am reading about trust-based philanthropy more and will try to focus on what that can mean for Egyptian NGOs. It would be lovely to have longer sessions in the future because there is such a rich experience that we can learn from 😀
Yasmine D'Alessandro
Egypt
I am unlearning the assumptions, power dynamics, and long-standing ways of doing things that have shaped development practice. I am moving away from the comfort of top-down decision-making toward shared ownership, where local voices are not just included but genuinely valued. Through this process, I am learning that transparency and collaboration are not optional; they are essential to how I work, decide, and build with others.
Mamta Rao
Broken Chalk - India
One of the strongest reflections from the session was the recognition that decision-making is often shaped by power and control over resources. While many organisations describe decision-making as “bottom-up,” the reality is that decisions are frequently influenced by those who hold funding and institutional power. Many of us, consciously or unconsciously, align our decisions with the priorities of those in positions of authority.
Moses Wanami
CFAO Mobility- Kenya
Let’s Connect
If you are curious about our work, exploring partnership with PRA, or interested in becoming an Associate Member, we would be glad to hear from you. We welcome conversations with practitioners, organisations, and funders who are seeking alignment, shared learning, and more relational approaches to development and philanthropy.
Schedule a ConversationLatest Articles
June 9, 2026
Matching Funds or Breeding Inequality?When philanthropy matches dollars in communities where wealth is measured differently
Read More →
May 28, 2026
Africa Day: Reimagining Solidarity, Power, and PartnershipOn Africa Day, we honour a continent defined not only by its diversity and resilience, but by its deep traditions of solidarity, community knowledge, and collective imagination.
Read More →
May 27, 2026
Not everything should scale…By Imelda E. Akurut. Lately, I am convinced that context deserves a budget line, but don’t mind me, I am just a health economist, systems thinker, and reluctant participant in scalability conversations. Development has become obsessed with scale, but what if not everything should scale?
Read More →